![]()
I've been a Dusty Springfield fan ever since her family's version of "Silver Threads and
Golden Needles"; at one time, I thought nothing could surpass the moment when she
joyously allayed eveyone's adolescent romantic anxieties with "I said no matter,
no matter what you do/I only want to be with you." But little did I suspect that this
newest album, appropriately entitled Cameo, would be such a superior and involving
piece of work. Her smokey, intimate voice has been singing in my living room for
weeks now, and I'm not tired yet.
The songs herein are about love, fighting, expectations, growing, breaking uo,
reunion, and so on. Some celebrate, others rue. Most are by Dennis Lambert and Brian Potter,
Dusty's producers, though there's one by Bread's great David Gates, as well as Van
Morrison's "Tupelo Honey" (beautiful tune, stupid lyric.) Lambert's and Potter's songs aren't
too ambitious, but they are solid and simple, speaking of love in direct images and unpretentious
language. The arrangements will be familiar to fans: spare and open, crispy ominous electric piano
and rhythm guitar chords over unison strings playing easy, masculine figures. The rhythms are
often forward-moving, or otherwise neo-Motown; the feeling is more from the world of "The Look
of Love," "Anyone Who Had A Heart" and "You Don't Have To Say You Love Me" than
"Windmills of Your Mind."
Further, I can't say that I've ever heard a better match of material to singer/persona.
Dusty is a mature woman, one who's been around, who's upfront about her experiences. She
strikes a balance between the sensibilities of Joni Mitchell and Loretta Lynn. The songs
seem to be her own; the integrity is striking. There is little vocal artifice, though there's
plenty of expressivity. The voice doesn;t puch big messages, or beat it's breast (to mix metaphors).
Cameo is as natural and easy as a Carol King record, though it is not at all adolescent,
being more redolent of cigarette butts and empty Manhatten glasses. If you've been put off by
the distant cleanliness of Judy Collins, the fraudulent emotionalism of Carly Simon, and the
inattentiveness to lyric and meaning of Roberta Flack and Karen Carpenter, then give a listen to
Dusty Springfield. There's nothing to object to in Cameo.
Peter Moran
Nothing has given me so much pleasure in the past couple of months as
hearing this album. I've long believed that Dusty Springfield is more
than a match for most of the highly rated rock singers I've heard, yet
apart from odd flashes on her albums, a few of her singles, and the
Dusty in Memphis collection, there's been very little hard
evidence to back up my belief. That's frustrating, not so much because
I needed the evidence myself, but because I was tired of other people's
scepticism. Go on Dusty, show 'em -- and on Cameo she surely
has.
It's almost the album I've been longing for her to make, and it'll
certainly do more than well until the next one. It surprised me slightly
by achieving the effect I'd been hoping for, but through different means . . .
What she's done (apart from the pure rhythm section and horns on "Tupelo
Honey") is combine a tight rhythm section with more conventional string
arrangements, and though it flags on some tracks, it surpasses even my
imagined results in others.
"Who Gets Your Love" is the perfect example -- the arrangement for bass,
drums, guitar, strings, horns and backing vocals provide her with a rich
yet firm background over which her voice soars. More than any other
singer I know she has the ability to keep her voice on a taunt rein,
perfect control, yet at the same time use it as powerfully expressive
instrument.
On "Easy Evil" the restraint of the band enhances that quality, and her
craftsmanship throughout the album is breathtaking. Even on fairly mediocre
songs with unimaginative arrangements, the phrasing and little twists in the
melody give her the edge.
I got tough with myself after listening to the album over a couple of
weeks and made myself list the tracks I could really say I enjoyed
without reservation. I came to the conclusion that two - "Who Gets Your
Love" and "Tupelo Honey" -- were outstanding, three almost made it to
that, and the rest I had various reservations about, mostly because I
didn't particularly like the songs or the arrangements. There aren't too
many albums I can rate that highly.
Author and publication unknown.
Rolling Stone, 1973